HIROSHIMA / INDEPENDENT / IMPLEMENTATION

From
Hiroshima,
making AI
decisions

verifiable.

The Hiroshima AI Assurance Council is an independent, industry-led council based in Hiroshima, Japan. It develops the Hiroshima AI Assurance Protocol (HAAP), a proposed practical framework for AI-assisted decisions: verify the required conditions before adoption, then preserve the evidence chain after.

広島から、AI判断の採用条件・証拠・責任の流れを後から確認できる形に残すための、民間・独立の協議会です。

Inspired by the Hiroshima AI Process (G7, 2023). Independently operated; not affiliated with or representative of any government body.

01

Responsibility Design

REQUREMENTS FIXED

02

Pre-Execution
Assurance

Evidence evaluated

03

Transition Authorization

Before action

04

Verifiable Record

Replayable

ABOUT

From governance
principales

to 

operationalassurance.

The Council focuses on the implementation gap: how organizations can prove that an AI-assisted decision met defined conditions before changing real-world state.

01

Representative
Organization

ONZALINX, Inc., a Hiroshima-based logistics DX company, leads Council coordination and field implementation.

02

Initiator / Technical Partner

GhostDrift Mathematical Institute, Inc. initiated the project and contributes Responsibility OS, ADIC, HAAP materials, and formal verification work.

03

Cross-sector contribution

Companies, universities, public organizations, and engineers are invited to contribute through review, PoC testing, and joint research while formal membership terms are being developed.

ABOUT

From governance
principales

to 

operationalassurance.

The Council focuses on the implementation gap: how organizations can prove that an AI-assisted decision met defined conditions before changing real-world state.

01

Representative
Organization

ONZALINX, Inc., a Hiroshima-based logistics DX company, leads Council coordination and field implementation.

02

Initiator / Technical Partner

GhostDrift Mathematical Institute, Inc. initiated the project and contributes Responsibility OS, ADIC, HAAP materials, and formal verification work.

03

Cross-sector contribution

Companies, universities, public organizations, and engineers are invited to contribute through review, PoC testing, and joint research while formal membership terms are being developed.

Hiroshima AI Assurance Protocol

Assured beforeaction.

verifiable afterward.

HAAP is a proposed assurance and interoperability layer connecting Business Profiles with agent, tool, and transport protocols. It does not replace HTTP, gRPC, Agent2Agent (A2A), or Model Context Protocol (MCP). It defines how requirements, accountability-relevant information, evidence, verification results, adoption states, and transition authorization records are linked and exchanged.

Pre-Execution Assurance

Before state change

Required conditions and evidence are evaluated before an AI-assisted decision is adopted as an organizational decision.

Claim–Evidence Separation

Claims are not verification

Inspection claims are evaluated against evidence independent of the claim, under trust requirements defined by the applicable profile.

Verifiable Record

Inspectable afterward

Requirements, accountability-relevant information, evidence references, verification results, adoption states, and transition authorization records are integrity-bound and preserved for later review, independent verification, and replay.

Implementation Evidence

From a tested logistics
PoC

toward a common
assurance protocol.

The first public reference PoC, completed as Phase 1, tested fixed ruleset binding, evidence inspection, independent recalculation, disposition generation, chain-stop control, digest binding, and replay verification for a pharmaceutical cold-chain handoff scenario.

Phase 1 implementation

The public repository documents the implemented functions, test
scenarios, replay procedure, scope, and known limitations.

Relationship to HAAP

The PoC provides functional precursors that inform HAAP.
It does not implement the complete HAAP record schema, domain-independent
state separation, or multi-system interoperability.

Technical Evidence

Open materials make

the technical basis inspectable.

The Council publishes non-normative technical overviews, formal foundations, and reference implementation materials so that its technical claims can be examined independently. PoC results, implementation scope, and known limitations are documented alongside the relevant projects.

HAAP Technical Overview

How requirements, accountability-relevant information, evidence, verification results, adoption states, and transition authorization records are linked and exchanged.

Formal Foundations

Lean 4 formalizations of evidence and responsibility preservation under composition, and policy-relevant inspectability.

ADIC AI Assurance / Lean

Responsibility OS Kernel

Reference Implementations & PoC Testing

Working PoCs, replay materials, PoC results, implementation scope, and known limitations.

These materials support independent inspection and reproducibility. They do not by themselves establish the safety, compliance, or correctness of any real-world deployment.

CONTACT

Contribute review,

PoC testing, or domain expertise.

Council inquiries are currently routed through a temporary GhostDrift technical contact form and coordinated with ONZALINX, the representative organization.